Germany announces electricity price support package

The German Government has found a new agreement on how to bring down electricity prices for businesses. Here, we look at the content and politics in the support package.
Germany announces electricity price support package

The German Government has found a new agreement on how to bring down electricity prices for businesses. Here, we look at the content and politics in the support package.

  • The German Government announced today new measures to bring down electricity prices for industry. The package consists of a broad cut to the electricity tax, extended compensation for internationally exposed companies and a reinforced exemption on the renewable energy levy for the most energy-intensive companies. 
  • The measures will be in place for five years and cost around €12 billion annually. It will be partly funded from the Budget and partly from the Climate and Transition Fund.  
  • This package is a win for Finance Minister Christian Lindner, who always wanted the measures to focus on tax cuts and to give more to SMEs. Economy Minister Robert Habeck will try to spin that the end result for big energy-intensive industries will be the same as under his original proposal, though that remains unclear. 
  • This will provide an important precedent for France in its quest to subsidise electricity prices. Smaller states will worry that this is another blow to the Single Market. 

The German Government has just announced how it wants to lower electricity prices for businesses, particularly for the most energy-intensive companies.  

After months of debate, the coalition has settled on a limited package of subsidies combined with tax cuts, mostly in line with what we predicted (see: Options for the German industrial electricity price).  

There are three measures in the package. The first applies to all manufacturers and consists of a simple cut to the standard tax paid on electricity consumption down to the minimum level permitted by EU law. This by itself can take off about €0.015/kWh. This extends the current ‘peak compensation’, whereby small- and medium-sized companies could get up to 90% discount on their electricity price if they could prove they have invested in energy efficiency and climate measures. Under the new agreement, the need to prove this would be removed. 

Second, there is an extension of electricity price compensation for the most internationally exposed companies. This also includes relief for indirect carbon costs.  

Third, the ‘super cap’, which applies to the 90 most energy-intensive companies, will also be extended and expanded. At the moment, this limits the amount these companies must pay for the renewables levy. The new agreement would simply bring it down to 0%.  

That final set of companies will therefore be able to stack all the measures together to make for a significant cut in electricity costs. 

All these measures are pencilled in to last for five years, with a guarantee until 2026, and would come at a cost of around €12 billion per year, with a large part drawn from the Climate and Transformation Fund. 

This package ultimately represents a win for Finance Minister Christian Lindner. He strongly argued against the initial proposal from Economy Minister Robert Habeck, which consisted of state-funded subsidies for the most energy-intensive industrial companies (see: First details on the German industrial electricity tariff).  

Lindner objected on two key grounds. One was that the support would be too focused on big companies and would not do enough for the SMEs that form the core of his party’s base. The other was it was wrong to generate new spending and rely on a state-driven process when taxes could be cut instead.  

With this new agreement, Lindner appears to have won on both points, as the biggest single measure (the electricity tax cut) has a wider scope, and the support mostly takes the form of tax cuts. 

Nonetheless, Habeck will still spin this as a win for him. He argued that energy-intensive industries needed access to an electricity price of around €0.05-0.06/kWh to remain competitive. By piling the different measures on top of each other, he’ll argue that companies in this position will be able to do just that and that he has delivered on their needs.  

Politically, the intervention could be significant for the Government as a whole. If they can convince both the public and investors that they have secured the short-term future of industry while new energy sources are developed, and companies decarbonise, then it could give them a much-needed economic and electoral boost. If nothing else, some respite from the constant coalition infighting should help. 

A German agreement on an industrial electricity price will also have broader repercussions for Europe.  

While it’s too late to impact discussions around reform of the electricity market, other countries such as France are also looking at how to support their industry and lower electricity prices through national policies.  

The likely French approach is quite different as it would involve taxing their nuclear power output and then redistributing these revenues (see: France’s plans for redistributing EDF revenues). But for Germany to advance in this area would still set a precedent, both in terms of the principle and also in terms of how it is applied (such as requiring a wider scope and not limiting support to key industrial ‘champions’).  

But as well as encouraging large countries to do the same, it will create concern among smaller countries that they are being put at a competitive disadvantage. It is not obvious they will have any route to oppose what Germany is doing but it will complicate future discussions on state aid rules.  

The final compromise is a long way from the industrial electricity price that Habeck wanted at first, but it will still provide some relief for a number of businesses in Germany and some positive headlines for the Government. 

The real significance for Germany’s economy will depend on whether Habeck’s claims for the energy-intensive sector can be stacked up. 

Forefront Advisers’ Energy & Net Zero service unpacks the political dynamic and regulatory plans in energy, carbon pricing, CCUS, critical raw materials and net zero manufacturing. It covers global, EU, UK and national initiatives and connects the dots between them. See how it can support you.

Share Post:

Stay Connected

More Updates

More Posts

Get in touch

Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.

Forefront Advisers Limited, 154-160 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2DQ, registered in England and Wales, no. 13248974

Scroll to Top

Conor Sewell


Conor works across Forefront’s digital assets, emerging technology and UK political teams. He joined Forefront Advisers from Flint Global, where he worked on financial services and digital assets across the UK, EU and Asia-Pacific. He previously worked at HM Treasury on the UK’s future relationship with the EU and within the Bank of England’s Capital Markets Division. He holds a master’s degree in mathematics from the University of Oxford.

Ramona Visenescu

Associate Director

Ramona is an Associate Director focusing on sustainable finance and circular economy. Ramona previously worked in Brussels at Teneo, where she also covered ESG legislative priorities and interned at the European Commission in DG Economy and Finance. She earned her Bachelor degree in International Relations and European Studies from the University of Bucharest and completed an Advanced Master in Financial Markets at the Solvay Brussels School of Economics & Management.

Pietro Candia


Pietro works across EU Politics and is based in London. Before joining Forefront, he interned in other political risk advisory firms and worked in the government relations division of a major oil corporation. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in International Politics from Georgetown University and a Master’s degree in European and International Public Policy from LSE.

Imogen Stead

Senior Analyst

Imogen works across UK Politics. She has previously worked for two Civil Service departments covering policy and stakeholder engagement, and has experience in Marketing & External Affairs from her time at Oxford University Press and a members’ club in Brussels. She holds a first class BA and an MPhil in Classics from the University of Oxford, and is in the process of obtaining a DPhil in the subject. 

Michele Grassi


Michele works on EU digital assets policy and Italian politics. He previously interned as MEP assistant at the European Parliament and as a Policy analyst at the Lombardy Regional Council. Michele holds a double degree MSc in European Public Policy from LSE and Bocconi University.

Pascal LeTendre-Hanns


Pascale leads on Forefront’s Energy & Net Zero and Sustainability insights. Pascal previously worked in the Paris-based pro-European think tank, EuropaNova. He is leading sustainability policy coverage and following political developments in France and Spain. He graduated from UCL with a First Class Honours degree in European Social and Political Studies, specialising in international relations and French, which included a year at Sciences Po Paris. 

Charles d’Arcy-Irvine


Charles works on political and policy insight advising businesses across different industries. He previously worked in investment banking at Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank, as an official at HM Treasury, as a political adviser to George Osborne, and in real estate. He holds a master’s degree in public administration from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and is a Trustee of the Epping Forest Schools Partnership Trust. 

Christopher Glück

Managing Director

Chris leads Forefront Advisers’ EU political analysis and insights team. He previously led Hanbury’s EU Public Affairs work. Previously, Chris worked on EU financial services policy in HM Treasury and as policy advisor for Jakob von Weizsäcker in the European Parliament. Chris holds a master’s degree from the College of Europe and read history at the University of Munich. 

Dea Markova

Managing Director

Dea leads Forefront Advisers’ crypto political and regulatory analysis team. She joined Forefront having grown and led the crypto client portfolio for FTI Consulting Brussels. Dea relocated back to Europe after her post in the Monetary Authority of Singapore, where she developed innovation programmes and infrastructure in the MAS Financial Technology and Innovation Group. She was also Head of Programmes for Innovate Finance, the UK FinTech trade association. Dea holds MSc Financial Regulation from the London School of Economics.

Gergely Polner

Managing Director

Gergely heads Forefront Advisers’ EU team. He was previously Head of EU Affairs at Standard Chartered Bank and at the British Bankers Association. Before his City career, he spent eight years at the EU institutions, including as a spokesperson for the EU Council Presidency and Head of UK Public Affairs for the European Parliament. While at the EU Institutions, Gergely worked on the EU’s sanctions regime and the regulatory reform in financial services. He started his career as a lawyer and built a successful legal translation business.

Get in touch

Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.

James McBride

Managing Director

James leads Forefront’s work on political and policy insight, advising businesses across a range of industriesJames previously worked in the Labour Party’s Policy Unit, where he led on economy and business policy. James worked on the ‘Labour In’ 2016 EU Referendum and 2017 General Election campaigns, as well as the party’s response to Budgets and other fiscal events. Prior to this, James worked in five government departments across Whitehall.